@0, I whole heartedly agree here. This is loosely correlated with this ToDo post --> { Link } :: Also, as an aside... I spent over an hour with the ToDo developer at LS08 going through workflow improvements for ToDos.

One item we discussed included the ability to comment and send updates on longer-term/range assigned tasks--which they liked. So you and I are in-synch here too. The LS08 dev meeting went well and they took a lot of notes and appreciated the input. Hopefully the end result will be one that actually converts the feature's potential greatness into actual.

@1 - yes, we've very much in agreement. Folks, please vote for both... I searched for "to do" and "to dos" (note the space...) and didn't find anything so I posted.

What's .really. funny is that promoted your idea back in November.

Guess that's why I have a driver's license... to remember where I live...

To Do's should be treated with similar capabilities that a calendar entry has, in that it needs to be "requested" of another person, accepted by them, or countered, commented on, delegated, etc.

The complete history of the transaction should be kept available to all involved in the action item and able to be tagged with common structured fields like: Customer, Project, etc.

All action items should be able to be displayed in a table format for project review meetings and ad-hoc comments/updates made quickly and easily, without popping up a lot of forms to fill in. Treat it like a spreadsheet entry method and then batch process all updates for speed during a meeting.