| 27 Aug 2008 | John Gustafson | Add new view "Groups By Members" to the Domino Directory We have found this type of view only necessary for "deny" groups when trying to resurrect an ID or to audit that a specific ID has been placed into Denied Access groups. |
| 27 Aug 2008 | Bruce Elgort | Disable Export Of View Data Ulrich I agree and support your idea. Some indication needs to be provided to the user that they are trying to do something that the database manager is not letting them do. Good catch. |
| 26 Aug 2008 | Bruce Elgort | Open Mic Should be Scheduled Twice During the Day I forgot to mention that I do support and have promoted your idea. |
| 26 Aug 2008 | Bruce Elgort | Open Mic Should be Scheduled Twice During the Day Julie this is an interesting post it really doesn't pertain to a particular IBM/Lotus product and it certainly doesn't belong in the IdeaJam IdeaSpace. Let me add a category for this type of idea. |
| 25 Aug 2008 | Ken Haggman | Make 'Shared Action' in to stand alone design elements Very good idea, I support it. |
| 25 Aug 2008 | Giulio C | Commit/Rollback Changes This has been one of the gaping weaknesses for Domino. How many times have complex document hierarchies and relationships been corrupted when a process only completes half the changes because of an "object variable not set error" ? I would like the idea of a commit/rollback in script. Seeing as document models can take any shape, something like a "Transaction Start" and a "Transaction Commit" commands in your code would be great. I suppose the caveat would be that transaction command pairs (ie start/commit) would have to be in the same sub. I think this would only work in a scheduled agent to. Because re-running the log would be way to hard from UI. The next step would be working out how to link transaction dependancies between subs so if an error occured in a called sub that the rollback would be reported to the calling sub so it could take action in completing the roll-back... The other problem would be storing the log somewhere in cases where people are modifying very large collections of documents, the log would be humungous. Probably from a transaction server/file store ? Not so simple.. but if it could be done, it would put all those relational zealots in their place.. LOL.. Thumbs up from me... I wish people who demote ideas justified their answer. It may provide some insight in refining the idea... |
| 23 Aug 2008 | Mick Moignard | Reply To All should not include me in the list of intended recipients That may work if the recipient name in a reply to all is a Notes name matching the sender, but when it's an my internet address, it still appears in the reply-to-all recipient list. Mick |
| 22 Aug 2008 | William McLoone | Give us New Letterheads! If nothing else, retaining the old ones would be a start. When I replaced my mail design from inotes6 to mailR8, the database retained my "Lotus Notes Postmark" letter head however the template is gone. So if I change it to something else, I do not have the option to change it back. Although I do like the idea of being able to have a library of letterheads or maybe even a right-click option from an image to "Make Picture Letterhead Graphic" similar to the Windows "Save as Wallpaper" option. |
| 22 Aug 2008 | William McLoone | Reply To All should not include me in the list of intended recipients Confirmed: My experience has been that if the sender matches the recipient, it is not added to the address fields in a "reply to all" situation. The same is true if a member of a distribution group sends to the group they are a member of. I suspect that the to and from names don't match for some reason, or maybe the mail owner is outdated? |
| 22 Aug 2008 | Jens-B. Augustiny | Sub-Pages / Sub-Tabs in the workspace Yes, would like to have the bookmarks back ...... |
| 22 Aug 2008 | Martin Vogel | Improvements for the Diretory Catalog (configuration form) David, yes the pull down buttons currently do not exist. You are right. I would like to have this buttons for selecting databases or field names. |
| 20 Aug 2008 | Bob Brodsky | Add A Frame Property To NotesUIDocument and NotesUIView Peter, TOTALLY agree! Bob |
| 20 Aug 2008 | Matt White | Ability to change the views Melissa, Using the language documents you are able to change any displayed text in IdeaJam, including the different statuses. If you need any help please feel free to drop us a line at ideajamsupport@elguji.com Matt |
| 19 Aug 2008 | David Killingsworth | Improvements for the Diretory Catalog (configuration form) To be more clear and articulate what the author of this idea is requesting.... The Pull down tabs/buttons in the Red Boxes in the diagram above currently DO NOT exist. He's asking for pull down's so that we can select fields from the directories directly without having to manually type the field name in. |
| 19 Aug 2008 | David Killingsworth | Improvements for the Diretory Catalog (configuration form) Totally agree. |
| 19 Aug 2008 | Henry Ferlauto | Meeting Rooms & Conference calls That's a good one! Should keep a few developers employed for a while. |
| 19 Aug 2008 | Jordan Tenjeras | Enforce (or advise) the need for a default view Ben, I hear what you're saying but I'd argue for not making the other functions require a default view in the first place! This seems a very strange design choice to me but someone smarter than I created the product. Given the design decision has already been made I tend to agree with a warning as a minimum. |
| 16 Aug 2008 | Sjef Bosman | Linux support for Quickr Domino version And apparently it's still not there... |
| 15 Aug 2008 | Theo Heselmans | Option for a Field to have its content selected when getting focus @Joseph: your solution does not work in Notes, and it only works on clicking. I need a Notes solution, that also works when e.g. tabbing. There is a 2 line solution, but I don't want to add it to each field. BTW this works: Sub Entering(Source As Field) Dim ws As New NotesUIWorkspace Call ws.CurrentDocument.SelectAll End Sub |
| 15 Aug 2008 | Morten Clausen | Emailing a subform from the current UI document RenderToRTItem is your friend with a little fiddling of the Form-field, I think. I seem to recall doing something like this with a (possibly computed) subform on a very simple form: changing the Form of the document-to-be-sent, rendering the changed document to an RT-item on another document and mailing that. Long time ago so details are a little fuzzy... :-) |