<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:09:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<title>IdeaJam by Elguji Software RSS Feed</title>
	<description>An RSS feed generated by IdeaJam by Elguji Software for All comments</description>
	<link>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf</link>
	
	<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Make PostDocumentDelete subject to ACL</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Richard Hogan&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I had this exact same issue, documents being put in a deletions db, courtesy of code in the PostDocumentDelete, even though they were not actually successfully deleted from the original db. Created some confusion until we realised that people without delete right were not actually deleting docs. I agree that this should be changed.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/461130798/DE90B2BADA6F029986257508004BE593</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/DE90B2BADA6F029986257508004BE593?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Calendering Administration</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Josh Gadbois&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I loathe Notes. This would make it less painful to work with, though.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/302577035/41E2A9AA7837DABD86257348005440B0</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/41E2A9AA7837DABD86257348005440B0?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: File does not exist...</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ninke Westra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; like this one: { &lt;a href="http://woonjas.linuxnerd.org/web/woonblog.nsf/d6plinks/NWEA-7F4GMQ" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt; }&lt;br /&gt;or this one:&lt;br /&gt;{ &lt;a href="http://woonjas.linuxnerd.org/web/woonblog.nsf/d6plinks/NWEA-7CFJQF" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt; }&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460723214/C7F9E079EECE236D86257508002F61C8</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/C7F9E079EECE236D86257508002F61C8?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: File does not exist...</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ninke Westra&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; How about just improve the error reporting period, especially in the R8 Standard/Eclipse client. There are tons of complaints out there&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460723214/C7F9E079EECE236D86257508002F61C8</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/C7F9E079EECE236D86257508002F61C8?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Alert the administrator</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Charlene Taylor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; You are assuming that the IdeaSpace administrators read every idea. If there is a the volume of ideas (and comments for that matter) I can't imagine administrators would be able to read every idea and comment. It would be nice to allow the community to alert the administrator of something inappropriate.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/266157364/DCBF2AF3CAB401C5862574250008DEA4</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/DCBF2AF3CAB401C5862574250008DEA4?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: File does not exist...</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Theo Heselmans&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Where ? When ?&lt;br /&gt;Please elaborate. IdeaJam is not for bug-reporting.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460723214/C7F9E079EECE236D86257508002F61C8</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/C7F9E079EECE236D86257508002F61C8?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow for Follow up flags in any view</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Dietmar Dumke&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; We have created a "Create -&amp;gt; Mail -&amp;gt; Special -&amp;gt; Link Reminder" form in the mail template. Works almost similar to the "Link message" thingy, but instead creates a Reminder in the personal calendar containing a doclink to the document. Works with documents in any database, and requires only Reader rights on them.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460699197/2141ED61987D0AB8862574470075D1C0</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/2141ED61987D0AB8862574470075D1C0?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Make the STHelpers part of the core Sametime client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Dietmar Dumke&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Having Linux/Mac in mind - because it is COM it is Windows proprietary. This might be reason enough for IBM to not include it in the base packages.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460699198/AE0146B6AAE41B448625741E00067D17</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/AE0146B6AAE41B448625741E00067D17?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Add LS function to determine if debugger is running</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Rob Goudvis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I have asked this before, so yes please add this function.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460558681/1362F6D41808FAFD862575080003871B</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/1362F6D41808FAFD862575080003871B?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Add LS function to determine if debugger is running</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Paul Davies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I'd also like to see some kind of ForceStepOver directive command so that if you have a proc that you are happy works, but loops a million times, you can add the directive to it, and then the debugger steps over the proc even if you accidentally step into it. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460558681/1362F6D41808FAFD862575080003871B</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/1362F6D41808FAFD862575080003871B?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Make all the UIs independent threads</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Paul Davies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; and be able to open any client more than once&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/460558682/1FE723E199581EF6862575080030BDA2</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/1FE723E199581EF6862575080030BDA2?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow access to Designer/Notes/Admin Clients while debugging</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; chris boote&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; In fact all five 'clients' (Admin, Designer, Client, Debugger &amp;amp; properties box) should have their own threads and be independent of each other&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/218034508/EC142619213A7E51862573D3001153F7</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/EC142619213A7E51862573D3001153F7?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Action Bar (actions) global hide-when formula</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; chris boote&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I would prefer the ability (like we have in forms) to have a subform for buttons that can be applied to any view, so you could have an Admin subform, a User subform a Superuser subform and so on&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/271172974/430452BF9D29DEFB8625742C007396BC</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/430452BF9D29DEFB8625742C007396BC?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: New Eclipse LotusScript Editor - things to include</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Scott Leis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I'd rather say "look at Delphi", but the VS and Delphi IDEs probably have about the same functionality. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Something I badly want for LS code completion: it should also work for user-defined classes and types, and for all subs and functions (as it does in both VS and Delphi I think). In Designer, it currently only works for product classes.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/452320009/0F459AE89EE1614C86257500002676E9</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/0F459AE89EE1614C86257500002676E9?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Make refresh on keyword change drive specific fields</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Scott Cochrane&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Hi Chris, &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;I was thinking that the typical use case for this is when you choose an option on Field A that then drives field B. A pretty common occurence. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; And yes if used extensively on a form debugging would be a problem .. although in the situation I describe the fields are almost always next to each other. That said debugging usually gets harder as more flexibility is introduced but does that make the idea bad? If is was easy we wouldn't have a job, would we?! &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; And maybe I'm having a stupid moment but I can't see how you would do this with Input Translation - I guess you could update anothe computed field but you couldn't drive the choices on a specific keyword field - not without some messy solution. Suggestions welcome. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/459418516/1D82C284282FB8F4862574AD0048A155</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/1D82C284282FB8F4862574AD0048A155?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Make refresh on keyword change drive specific fields</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; chris boote&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Firstly, you could do this using the Input Translation&lt;br /&gt;Secondly, do you realise how much of a pain this would be to debug?&lt;br /&gt;Having to look at the properties of every field to find out why one field didn't recalculate? Yuk!&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/459418516/1D82C284282FB8F4862574AD0048A155</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/1D82C284282FB8F4862574AD0048A155?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 04:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Keyboard short cut for pasting plain text</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; chris boote&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; It should be Shift-CTRL-C&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/400080505/F25A638A2F256907862574CC005640DC</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/F25A638A2F256907862574CC005640DC?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Allow us to programatically control category column colours</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Rob Goudvis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I think it is a good idea. Maybe we need a "express designer" (sorry MS). That is a designer with a limited number of functions the user can set/change. The allowed functions will be mostly look-and-feel functions. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; You could imagine that the application manager/designer indicates what attributes of an application, or of its design elements can be modified by a user.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/459229837/BBDAA3A99B0FE89886257506005C1DC4</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/BBDAA3A99B0FE89886257506005C1DC4?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: NotesView.AllDocuments property for LotusScript</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Bill Fox&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; This is a real pain and needs to be included.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/458870736/E4451C7FBA2A047C862574FF004147C8</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/E4451C7FBA2A047C862574FF004147C8?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 10:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: circular use of script libs</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Jan Schulz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; @3: this is using variants, so is not compile save :-(&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/IdeaJamRssFeedAllComments/~3/257232282/A82B8EB5DE6254D286257415007F5D39</link>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/A82B8EB5DE6254D286257415007F5D39?opendocument</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel></rss>
