<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/rsstransform.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 10:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<title>IdeaJam(tm) : Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
	<description>An RSS feed generated by IdeaJam(tm) for Separate Design Client From Notes Client</description>
	<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf</link>
	
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>Domino Designer / : Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Peter Presnell&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tags:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;a href="http://ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/ProductByCategory?openview&amp;restricttocategory=designer"&gt;designer&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Idea:&lt;/b&gt; 
&lt;div&gt;One of the downsides to developing Notes client applications is that as a developer I am usually tied to using the same version of Notes/Designer that is deployed across the company.&amp;nbsp; This means I am unable to take advantage of many of the new features in Domino Designer until my company upgrades to a newwer version of Notes.&amp;nbsp; Even though some of the new features in designer are not specific to a pareticular version of Notes.&amp;nbsp; This is not the case for Web development.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;My suggestion would be to have the deigner client capable of recognising the capabilities of each version of the Notes client so that it is possible to develop a Notes application for a specific version of Notes. The same would hold true for Web client development in which HTML, JavaScript could be validated for&amp;nbsp;a specific browser etc.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Example:. It would be great if I could use the new Eclipse LotuScript browser when it becomes available before my company upgrades to that release of Notes.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?OpenDocument</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Scott Cochrane&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Sound idea&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=BF516AFE3F27B823862574A4003043E2</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Harkpabst Meliantrop&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; To me, the title doesn't seem to reflect the content of the idea too well. But I like the idea of designing against a specific target platform.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=A164804E883C690B862574820060B973</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Karl-Henry Martinsson&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; A little bit like this idea, perhaps: { &lt;a href="http://www.ideajam.net/IdeaJam/P/ij.nsf/0/C9469E0658D7A6B0862573A90076216D?OpenDocument" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Link&lt;/a&gt; }&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=07E52E85CD600DF38625748E0070EE43</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Denny Russell&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I would love to see them separated (and the Admin client too.) I hate the fact that if one is busy, I have to wait to get into the other one.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=68913E7A9C38B49B8625748E003FE9EB</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Ben Poole&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; I like this (although as Harkpabst mentions, I was expecting a different idea!) I would envisage this as being similar to the 'compiler compliance' settings you have in Eclipse on a per-project basis -- e.g. "this app is 6.5x-compliant"... "this app is 8.0.2-compliant"... and so on.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=DD310963E106FFAC8625748D00706F73</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Christopher Baier&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Several ideas in this one. I like the version-compliant-debugger/compiler idea.&lt;br /&gt;I also like the idea of separating Designer/Notes processing thread--when one is busy, so is the other one.&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=C4CE48160828C331862575390069B3D1</link>
	</item>
	<item>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<title>re: Separate Design Client From Notes Client</title>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Author:&lt;/b&gt; Rob Goudvis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Comment:&lt;/b&gt; Yes for @6&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<link>http://ideajam.net/ideajam/p/ij.nsf/0/4485E8AE326620758625747B00582E81?opendocument&amp;#commentsanc&amp;id=F7398FC27024E5468625764E004999D2</link>
	</item>
</channel></rss>
